Someone hack the Washington post, alter the emails on the mail sever and his computer to make them less inflammatory, then accuse him of libel. BOOM, redemption.
No. There's no special relationship between us and him that would impose a duty on him to keep the emails private. If you don't want them posted, don't send them.
quote:No. There's no special relationship between us and him that would impose a duty on him to keep the emails private. If you don't want them posted, don't send them.
This is one of your meanest posts in the last 24 hours!
On the slim chance you're serious: in Texas, once you send a letter or email, it is out of your control. The recipient can forward it, publish it, whatever.
I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on the Internet. Didn't even sleep at a Holiday Inn last night.
I'm a little aware of this, because I was somewhat of a jerk along these lines once. I complained to the editor of a local paper about certain sports coverage. He responded with a smart-@$$ snippy email. I forwarded it to about 300 of my closest friends.
Some reporter in dc wrote an article about the trademarking of "twelfth man" with regard to the local mls team.
A bunch of aggies got sand in their vaginas and wrote him emails. many of them resort to name calling instead of forming an argument. Some were well written though. he published them.
calling names < seeking legal council on the sand in vag meter.
The guy is a putz, everything has transpired on an internet blog for the washington post. The writer proved himself to be quite ignorant and his irrelevant little blog saw 10 times its normal traffic for two days.