Trump Team are unindicted co-conspirators in Michigan
893 Views | 8 Replies
...
hoopla
9:53a, 4/25/24


Why the difference in prosecutions between the states of Arizona and Michigan?

Is there an ambitious prosecutor in Arizona?
captkirk
10:38a, 4/25/24
So?
bobbranco
10:40a, 4/25/24
Lawfare!

Democrats destroy everything.
Ciboag96
10:42a, 4/25/24
This is hard evidence that our country is now a third world ****hole. Welcome everyone. **** gets real now.
MouthBQ98
10:44a, 4/25/24
I don't get the whole idiotic "fake electors" thing. There was a previously established practice of having an alternate slate of electors selected should various legal challenges happen to alter the outcome of a close state election result. It has just never happened yet. So the alternates are still prospective, and not understood or represented to be the actual current electors.

It's not like they kidnapped the original electors and went in with disguises or fake ID, or showed up when the electors were assembled and got in a fiat fight over who was legit….

The hyperbolics around this are beyond idiotic and should rightly be laughed out of any respectable courtroom.
Tramp96
10:47a, 4/25/24
Question for Forum 16 lawyers - aren't there laws in place that address prosecutorial abuse or misconduct? Wouldn't this type of stuff qualify? Do the State Bar Associations address stuff like this?

I just can't fathom that prosecutors can just go on like this unrestrained and unfettered.
DeSantis 2024
Dufflepud
11:30a, 4/25/24
In reply to Tramp96
Tramp96 said:

Question for Forum 16 lawyers - aren't there laws in place that address prosecutorial abuse or misconduct? Wouldn't this type of stuff qualify? Do the State Bar Associations address stuff like this?

I just can't fathom that prosecutors can just go on like this unrestrained and unfettered.
Tar and feathers used to be the remedy for misconduct. That, and riding a rail.
aggiehawg
11:42a, 4/25/24
In reply to MouthBQ98
MouthBQ98 said:

I don't get the whole idiotic "fake electors" thing. There was a previously established practice of having an alternate slate of electors selected should various legal challenges happen to alter the outcome of a close state election result. It has just never happened yet. So the alternates are still prospective, and not understood or represented to be the actual current electors.

It's not like they kidnapped the original electors and went in with disguises or fake ID, or showed up when the electors were assembled and got in a fiat fight over who was legit….

The hyperbolics around this are beyond idiotic and should rightly be laughed out of any respectable courtroom.
Particularly so since that was the approved procedure in the 1960 election with Hawaii having two slates during an election recount. In fact, had Hawaii not sent both slates, Congress would not have to accept any electors if not done in conformity with the safe harbor provision of the Electoral Count Act.

It is all BS. There were pending cases in the states that were not resolved but the deadline under the safe harbor provision was looming. And the safe harbor provision was of such importance to SCOTUS in 2000 that they acted extraordinarily fast to rule before that date in Bush v. Gore.
annie88
3:59p, 4/25/24
In reply to hoopla
Oh for ****s sake.

Enough of this bull*****
CLOSE
×
Cancel
Copy Topic Link to Clipboard
Back
Copy
Page 1 of 1
Post Reply
×
Verify your student status Register
See Membership Benefits >
CLOSE
×
Night mode
Off
Auto-detect device settings
Off