Kim Mulkey Story Incoming
6,497 Views | 40 Replies
...
Gap
7:58p, 3/23/24
The Washington Post is about to publish a story and profile of Kim Mulkey that will not paint her in a positive light. I don't know the subject matter, but Mulkey and LSU fans are in a panic.


Bucketrunner
8:20p, 3/23/24
Mulkey saying she's hired the best lawyers. If she's really done that, they'd be telling her to keep her mouth shut
BassCowboy33
8:41p, 3/23/24
That press conference today to was…something.
91AggieLawyer
9:51p, 3/23/24
In reply to Bucketrunner
Bucketrunner said:

Mulkey saying she's hired the best lawyers. If she's really done that, they'd be telling her to keep her mouth shut

No chance of that.

Incidentally, if it is from the compost, a guess might be her relationship with Griner and POSSIBLE accusations of "homophobia," whatever that means. (I'm the last person that's a KM fan -- quite the opposite, in fact -- but I seriously doubt she's afraid of anyone or anything). This lawyer stunt is to try and intimidate the post -- something KM lives by -- and I seriously doubt it will work.
texag84
9:11a, 3/24/24
Whatever it is, she's nervous cuz it's true!
Rudybryan
12:43p, 3/24/24
Can't wait to read it....,,
$240 Worth of Pudding
9:22p, 3/24/24
I hate Skeletor but I hate the media more.
I hope she burns them down.
dixichkn
2:53a, 3/25/24
All I know is she mentors Angel Reese. Biggest b**ch on the planet. Like coach, like player
MoreCushing4thePushing
11:32a, 3/25/24
In reply to Bucketrunner
Bucketrunner said:

Mulkey saying she's hired the best lawyers. If she's really done that, they'd be telling her to keep her mouth shut


Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post. I'm sure he's terrified.
Rudybryan
4:13p, 3/25/24
In reply to MoreCushing4thePushing
MoreCushing4thePushing said:

Bucketrunner said:

Mulkey saying she's hired the best lawyers. If she's really done that, they'd be telling her to keep her mouth shut


Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post. I'm sure he's terrified.
LMAO
CDub06
8:41a, 3/27/24
greg.w.h
5:07p, 3/27/24
Post wouldn't report Lewinsky…
Rudybryan
6:13p, 3/27/24
In reply to greg.w.h
greg.w.h said:

Post wouldn't report Lewinsky…
lol
greg.w.h
7:49p, 3/27/24
Can't imagine the situation is as bad as Pokey Chatman was…

"Chatman resigned from her post at LSU on March 7, 2007, amid allegations of an inappropriate relationship with a former player that were alleged to have begun when Chatman was coaching the player."
Sterling82
11:08a, 3/30/24
For the first time ever, I'm standing with Mulkey. They're going after her because she ain't woke.
Rudybryan
11:46a, 3/30/24
In reply to Sterling82
Sterling82 said:

For the first time ever, I'm standing with Mulkey. They're going after her because she ain't woke.


Anyone seen the article?
themissinglink
11:55a, 3/30/24
Scotty Flamingo
12:06p, 3/30/24
In reply to themissinglink
themissinglink said:





A whole lot of nothing in this article.
Cedar09
12:30p, 3/30/24
I hope it takes her down!
BassCowboy33
12:48p, 3/30/24
This is a really cool profile piece. I had no idea about her upbringing.

Sounds like Mukjey thought it was a hit piece, when it's just an in-depth look at what drives one of basketball's legendary coaches.
LawHall88
1:00p, 3/30/24
Maybe she didn't want people to know she was estranged from her father and sister, otherwise, no big deal.
greg.w.h
3:09p, 3/30/24
Summary of the story: https://www.theadvertiser.com/story/sports/college/lsu/2024/03/30/washington-post-kim-mulkey-story-lsu-womens-basketball-march-madness-brittney-griner/73089014007/
Sports-Ag
3:09p, 3/30/24
In reply to LawHall88
LawHall88 said:

Maybe she didn't want people to know she was estranged from her father and sister, otherwise, no big deal.


ESPN says Kim's attorneys says she goes into details about her family in her 2007 autobiography book.
BassCowboy33
3:16p, 3/30/24
In reply to Sports-Ag
Sports-Ag said:

LawHall88 said:

Maybe she didn't want people to know she was estranged from her father and sister, otherwise, no big deal.


ESPN says Kim's attorneys says she goes into details about her family in her 2007 autobiography book.


Article talks about that. It said Mulkey was upset The Post reached out about family business, but then it mentions that the story is already public because she mentioned it in her book nearly 20 years ago. The only difference here is that we actually hear from Mulkey's family who are trying desperately to get her back into the family.
20ag07
4:58p, 3/30/24
This whole brouhaha was so stupid.
greg.w.h
5:18p, 3/30/24
Syndicated story on msn start:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ar-BB1kNv0b
Rudybryan
5:51p, 3/30/24
In reply to greg.w.h
greg.w.h said:

Syndicated story on msn start:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ar-BB1kNv0b


Read Post story - unless I'm missing something there is nothing to sue about - I see facts not made up stories
greg.w.h
7:09p, 3/30/24
In reply to Rudybryan
Rudybryan said:

greg.w.h said:

Syndicated story on msn start:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ar-BB1kNv0b


Read Post story - unless I'm missing something there is nothing to sue about - I see facts not made up stories
That is the post story verbatim as far as I know. The suing had to do with the pressure and the ultimatum they used to try to get her to comment. I doubt she would win but it definitely colored how the article was ingested:
BassCowboy33
8:08p, 3/30/24
In reply to greg.w.h
greg.w.h said:

Rudybryan said:

greg.w.h said:

Syndicated story on msn start:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ar-BB1kNv0b


Read Post story - unless I'm missing something there is nothing to sue about - I see facts not made up stories
That is the post story verbatim as far as I know. The suing had to do with the pressure and the ultimatum they used to try to get her to comment. I doubt she would win but it definitely colored how the article was ingested:


They went to great lengths to get her side. If the story had been an investigative-style "hit piece", you usually don't go to the person in question until you get close to publication. That way you prevent them from from using to intimidation tactics on sources or clamming info sources. The fact they reached out to her a chunk of times should've been the first sign it wasn't a hit.

I'm also surprised they allowed comment through lawyers. That's not really required and some pubs won't do it. The post went to great lengths to get her perspective on this.
frenchtoast
9:53p, 3/30/24
Nothing really new in the article.
greg.w.h
11:02p, 3/30/24
In reply to BassCowboy33
BassCowboy33 said:

greg.w.h said:

Rudybryan said:

greg.w.h said:

Syndicated story on msn start:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ar-BB1kNv0b


Read Post story - unless I'm missing something there is nothing to sue about - I see facts not made up stories
That is the post story verbatim as far as I know. The suing had to do with the pressure and the ultimatum they used to try to get her to comment. I doubt she would win but it definitely colored how the article was ingested:


They went to great lengths to get her side. If the story had been an investigative-style "hit piece", you usually don't go to the person in question until you get close to publication. That way you prevent them from from using to intimidation tactics on sources or clamming info sources. The fact they reached out to her a chunk of times should've been the first sign it wasn't a hit.

I'm also surprised they allowed comment through lawyers. That's not really required and some pubs won't do it. The post went to great lengths to get her perspective on this.
The article went to everything we thought it would. It still had the smell of Compost.
greg.w.h
12:56a, 3/31/24
LA Times report got a fantastic response from Kim:

"I'm not going to let sexism continue," Mulkey said. "And if you don't think that's sexism, then you're in denial. How dare people attack kids like that. You don't have to like the way we play. You don't have to like the way we trash talk. You don't have to like any of that. We're good with that.

"But I can't sit up here as a mother and a grandmother and a leader of young people and allow somebody to say that. Because guys, that's wrong. I know sexism when I see it and I read it. That was awful."

https://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/39841036/kim-mulkey-rips-la-s-awful-portrayal-lsu-vs-ucla

She and Staley are fierce competitors and win NCs. Coming up with narratives to hate them is exactly what Kim said. Roll the ball out.
themissinglink
5:45a, 3/31/24
She didn't read any of it, but she is offended.
dixichkn
11:31p, 4/1/24
In reply to themissinglink
If you're drawing a breath in 2024, you're offended by something
GinMan
9:49a, 4/2/24
She classy
CLOSE
×
Cancel
Copy Topic Link to Clipboard
Back
Copy
Page 1 of 2
Post Reply
×
Verify your student status Register
See Membership Benefits >
CLOSE
×
Night mode
Off
Auto-detect device settings
Off