9:45a, 4/18/24
That's the rumor I heard from someone who knows him before the season started. Surprised it took this long.
9:47a, 4/18/24
Looks like he wasnt arrested until recently. So why sit out the entire season!?!?! TTHS and Illinois let their star players play the day after the arrests.
9:48a, 4/18/24
Man were we led astray here. I thought it was going to have something to do with academic dishonesty and A&M's Title IX Office was being obtuse.
And we are currently recruiting Pop Isaacs? That is beyond tone deaf.
And we are currently recruiting Pop Isaacs? That is beyond tone deaf.
9:52a, 4/18/24
In reply to ryange05
If they're arresting him after all this time they have plenty of evidence.
9:59a, 4/18/24
I suspect the kangaroo court had to do a criminal referral because it was just a kangaroo court.
10:15a, 4/18/24
In reply to Gap
It was pretty obvious it wasn't anything to do with academics.Gap said:
Man were we led astray here. I thought it was going to have something to do with academic dishonesty and A&M's Title IX Office was being obtuse.
10:20a, 4/18/24
In reply to Gap
It is weird why there was no arrest for 6 months. Maybe that is common process in these matters.
I repeatedly said it wasn't academics when people were like he cheated on a test or he plagiarized a paper. Pretty sure I was not aloneGap said:
Man were we led astray here. I thought it was going to have something to do with academic dishonesty and A&M's Title IX Office was being obtuse.
And we are currently recruiting Pop Isaacs? That is beyond tone deaf.
It is weird why there was no arrest for 6 months. Maybe that is common process in these matters.
10:21a, 4/18/24
Not sure how anybody has been led astray by complete silence and secrecy. Unless you're referring to texags speculations?
Anyway, this is a real bummer.
Anyway, this is a real bummer.
10:23a, 4/18/24
In reply to MarcAg
Yeah, and several of us pointed out back in November that if it was a Title IX issue, it had to be pretty serious for them to not let him play. Usually the default is they can still compete while the process is going on, but if its serious enough the dean of student life can override that.
People just wanted to convince themselves it wasn't serious.
People just wanted to convince themselves it wasn't serious.
10:36a, 4/18/24
In reply to bobinator
Maybe because Mr. Insider mikeysyracuse1 said it would be resolved shortly before the season started.
Edited for the correct user.
bobinator said:
Yeah, and several of us pointed out back in November that if it was a Title IX issue, it had to be pretty serious for them to not let him play. Usually the default is they can still compete while the process is going on, but if its serious enough the dean of student life can override that.
People just wanted to convince themselves it wasn't serious.
Maybe because Mr. Insider mikeysyracuse1 said it would be resolved shortly before the season started.
Edited for the correct user.
10:46a, 4/18/24
In reply to Know Your Enemy
In a way it might have been, we just weren't told about it, lol
10:52a, 4/18/24
In reply to Know Your Enemy
Here is exactly what I said since you are obsessed with me:Know Your Enemy said:bobinator said:
Yeah, and several of us pointed out back in November that if it was a Title IX issue, it had to be pretty serious for them to not let him play. Usually the default is they can still compete while the process is going on, but if its serious enough the dean of student life can override that.
People just wanted to convince themselves it wasn't serious.
Maybe because Mr. Insider Mikeyshooter said it would be resolved shortly before the season started.
Quote:
Eventually Buzz is going to have to come out and say that we don't expect him back. My guess is that will happen before SEC play.
10:56a, 4/18/24
The poster who said he ran into him multiple times in a month was playing with fire.
https://texags.com/forums/7/topics/3450736/2
https://texags.com/forums/7/topics/3450736/2
11:00a, 4/18/24
In reply to Mikeyshooter
My bad, bob is right. I had you confused with mikeysyracuse. I apologize.
Mikeyshooter said:Here is exactly what I said since you are obsessed with me:Know Your Enemy said:bobinator said:
Yeah, and several of us pointed out back in November that if it was a Title IX issue, it had to be pretty serious for them to not let him play. Usually the default is they can still compete while the process is going on, but if its serious enough the dean of student life can override that.
People just wanted to convince themselves it wasn't serious.
Maybe because Mr. Insider Mikeyshooter said it would be resolved shortly before the season started.Quote:
Eventually Buzz is going to have to come out and say that we don't expect him back. My guess is that will happen before SEC play.
My bad, bob is right. I had you confused with mikeysyracuse. I apologize.
11:12a, 4/18/24
mikesyracuse1 said:
Let it play out, It shouldn't be long.
Mikesyracuse1
For the record, this is the post I was referring to made on 10/27. When I questioned whether he had legitimate info or if he was just doing the usual internet thing of talking out of his ass I got dogpiled for questioning him.
https://texags.com/forums/7/topics/3413924/replies/66034284#66034284
11:15a, 4/18/24
In reply to Know Your Enemy
'Let it play out, it shouldn't be long' isn't exactly saying much.
11:16a, 4/18/24
(2/2) Marble was on A&M’s basketball roster last year but stepped away from the program right around when all this happened.
— 🚨 Rusty Surette 🚨 (@KBTXRusty) April 18, 2024
11:17a, 4/18/24
In reply to PJYoung
"Let it play out" insinuates that it's not a serious issue IMO. Clearly the "it shouldn't be long" was completely wrong.
11:28a, 4/18/24
In reply to Know Your Enemy
If I was told what happened at the time I would expect Marble to get cleared or charged certainly within a month. But that was before we all knew that the CSPD or I guess A&M cops were gonna spend weeks doing an in depth investigation to prove that Radford ran two stop signs.
Look, in his defense he can't talk about a criminal matter before a guy is charged and it USUALLY doesn't take 6 freaking months for somebody to get charged. Everything else is you reading into it and choosing to what, get miffed(?) that an insider turned out to be wrong? I don't know.Know Your Enemy said:
"Let it play out" insinuates that it's not a serious issue IMO. Clearly the "it shouldn't be long" was completely wrong.
If I was told what happened at the time I would expect Marble to get cleared or charged certainly within a month. But that was before we all knew that the CSPD or I guess A&M cops were gonna spend weeks doing an in depth investigation to prove that Radford ran two stop signs.
11:57a, 4/18/24
In reply to Gap
And where have you gotten any real evidence that we are recruiting Pop Issacs? The same place that said Andersson and Wade were in the portal?
Who exactly led you astray?Gap said:
Man were we led astray here. I thought it was going to have something to do with academic dishonesty and A&M's Title IX Office was being obtuse.
And we are currently recruiting Pop Isaacs? That is beyond tone deaf.
And where have you gotten any real evidence that we are recruiting Pop Issacs? The same place that said Andersson and Wade were in the portal?
12:06p, 4/18/24
Foremost, may justice served.
Secondly, Buzz should be commended for getting this surprise in October and adapting. He never let it become a talking point and respectfully pushed forward.
Secondly, Buzz should be commended for getting this surprise in October and adapting. He never let it become a talking point and respectfully pushed forward.
12:14p, 4/18/24
In reply to folkband
We are definitely recruiting Isaacs. ESPN and many other sources have confirmed our interest in him. His case differs from Marble's in that he is only being sued and has not been arrested, I believe.folkband said:Who exactly led you astray?Gap said:
Man were we led astray here. I thought it was going to have something to do with academic dishonesty and A&M's Title IX Office was being obtuse.
And we are currently recruiting Pop Isaacs? That is beyond tone deaf.
And where have you gotten any real evidence that we are recruiting Pop Issacs? The same place that said Andersson and Wade were in the portal?
12:25p, 4/18/24
In reply to Know Your Enemy
In that guy's defense, Marble's rep told some people within a few weeks of that post that he was hopeful of expediting a resolution in the near future. There are a lot of moving parts and things change.
Know Your Enemy said:mikesyracuse1 said:
Let it play out, It shouldn't be long.
Mikesyracuse1
For the record, this is the post I was referring to made on 10/27. When I questioned whether he had legitimate info or if he was just doing the usual internet thing of talking out of his ass I got dogpiled for questioning him.
https://texags.com/forums/7/topics/3413924/replies/66034284#66034284
In that guy's defense, Marble's rep told some people within a few weeks of that post that he was hopeful of expediting a resolution in the near future. There are a lot of moving parts and things change.
12:37p, 4/18/24
Unfortunately, this news confirms what I stated in another thread regarding Marble.
My opinion on how this unfolded is that Marble and the complainant went through the Title IX process as outlined in the Title IX policy. Depending on the report from the complainant, this could have either gone through an informal resolution process first or it could have gone directly to a formal resolution. Once the formal resolution process started, the university instigated their investigation. That process would take time as it involves interviewing both parties and anyone who might be a witness to the night's events. Upon completion of the investigation, a formal hearing was conducted where evidence was presented and a university-appointed panel determined the legitimacy of the complaint and the severity of the accusation.
Since Marble was arrested, the assumption is that the investigation uncovered enough evidence to warrant a report to law enforcement. Once law enforcement became involved, it moved to a potential criminal investigation. That criminal investigation resulted in Marble's arrest. Why was none of this public knowledge? Because any Title IX case is handled with confidentiality. Many of these cases are resolved and do not warrant involvement of law enforcement but there are instances when the allegation is serious enough and the investigation uncovers sufficient evidence that the university reports it to law enforcement.
My opinion on how this unfolded is that Marble and the complainant went through the Title IX process as outlined in the Title IX policy. Depending on the report from the complainant, this could have either gone through an informal resolution process first or it could have gone directly to a formal resolution. Once the formal resolution process started, the university instigated their investigation. That process would take time as it involves interviewing both parties and anyone who might be a witness to the night's events. Upon completion of the investigation, a formal hearing was conducted where evidence was presented and a university-appointed panel determined the legitimacy of the complaint and the severity of the accusation.
Since Marble was arrested, the assumption is that the investigation uncovered enough evidence to warrant a report to law enforcement. Once law enforcement became involved, it moved to a potential criminal investigation. That criminal investigation resulted in Marble's arrest. Why was none of this public knowledge? Because any Title IX case is handled with confidentiality. Many of these cases are resolved and do not warrant involvement of law enforcement but there are instances when the allegation is serious enough and the investigation uncovers sufficient evidence that the university reports it to law enforcement.
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.