From Epoch Times:

A growing body of peer-reviewed scientific evidence links heart issues with the mRNA vaccines.

So much so that the CDC and other government authorities in the United States and around the world now recognize that the COVID-19 vaccines are causing [url=https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/myocarditis.html#:~:text=For%20most%20cases%20of%20myocarditis,after%20mRNA%20COVID%2D19%20vaccination.][/url]myocarditisheart inflammation which is considered more severe than pericarditis because it causes inflammation of the heart muscle.
In June 2022, the FDA's Tom Shimabukuro, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A., identified as part of the CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Coordination Unit, reported that: "Current evidence supports a causal association between mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and myocarditis and pericarditis."

Six months later, as of Dec. 2, 2022, there have been a total of 35,718 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis reported to the government's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System.

Australian Cardiologist Calls to Halt mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines, Citing Heart Damage

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Epoch_Times

"The Epoch Media Group's news sites and YouTube channels have spread misinformation and conspiracy theories, such as QAnon and anti-vaccine misinformation,[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Epoch_Times#cite_note-:19-34][34][/url][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Epoch_Times#cite_note-40][40][/url] and false claims of fraud in the 2020 United States presidential election.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Epoch_Times#cite_note-43][43][/url]"

In reply to FlyRod Now try a response without fallacies

In reply to FlyRod "Wikipedia is not a reliable source" - instructions on every research paper issued in the past 15 years

In reply to GAC06

GAC06 said:

---

Now try a response without fallacies

---

Ok.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109722071078

Go to the National Library of Medicine (PubMed) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ and use the search terms in bold text below. Think how long we have had influenza vaccines and the trillions of doses administered over the years and yet, ..... there have only been 58 papers published in the PubMed databases that include both the terms "influenza vaccine" and "myocarditis".

Now look at the papers on "COVID-19 vaccine" and "myocarditis" - 632 papers and the COVID-19 vaccine has only been around since winter 2019/2020.

Don't believe me, do the searches yourselves.

Even if all 632 COVID-19/Myocarditis papers say there is NO association with the COVID-19 vaccine, then why does it take 632 papers to prove the vaccine doesn't cause myocarditis?

influenza vaccine AND myocarditis: 58 papers

covid-19 vaccine AND myocarditis: 632 papers

Citing relative numbers of research papers as proof of causation? And with no regard as to what the papers say?

Wow.

In reply to TulsAg And how many of those papers were comparing the risk of myocarditis from Covid vs. the vaccine? WolfCall's analysis includes them, which could completely contradict his point.