Norwood addition continues remarkable trend for Fisher, Aggies
Rating: 93
?
National Avg
Rating: 91.8
?
School Preferences
School
Offer
Interest
Texas A&M
Signed
Alabama
None
Auburn
None
Boston College
None
Colorado
None
Illinois
None
Indiana
None
Kentucky
None
Louisville
None
Michigan State
None
NC State
None
Nebraska
None
North Carolina
None
Purdue
None
Temple
None
Tennessee
None
UCF
None
Vanderbilt
None
Virginia Tech
None
Wake Forest
None
West Virginia
None
+ 11 More
Videos
(17 Total)
6/19/2020
Ask Liucci, Part 1: Previewing A&M's pass rush, Coley's recruiting impact & more
5/30/2020
Ask Liucci: Recruiting on a roll, impact freshmen and much more
2/10/2020
Offensive Grades: Texas A&M's 2019 & 2020 signing classes by position
2/6/2020
McGee: A&M's 2020 class showcases Jimbo Fisher's recruiting prowess
1/30/2020
Stephen McGee discusses most intriguing recruits from A&M's 2020 class
1/9/2020
Stephen McGee analyzes Kellen Mond and the 2020 SEC QB landscape
1/3/2020
Around Aggieland (1/3)
1/3/2020
All-American Bowl Update: Jason Howell analyzes the A&M signees & targets
1/1/2020
A&M signee Muhsin Muhammad III ready to get to work in Aggieland
12/18/2019
Jimbo Fisher analyzes signees from Texas A&M's 2020 class
11/6/2019
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
6/10/2019
Liucci & Brauninger analyze A&M's newest commit Troy Omeire
6/7/2019
Muhsin Muhammad III sees championship roster being built at A&M
6/5/2019
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
6/4/2019
John Harris dissects A&M's chances at an SEC West crown in '19
12/12/2018
C H A P T E R 3 . . .
1/10/2018
"ITS BEEN QUITE A RIDE..."
Show more
Updates
(0 Total)
Ask Liucci, Part 1: Previewing A&M's pass rush, Coley's recruiting impact & more
Three Things: The difference a year makes, next year's names & more
Ask Liucci: Recruiting on a roll, impact freshmen and much more
Offensive Grades: Texas A&M's 2019 & 2020 signing classes by position
More Stories
Photos
(3 Total)
Career Stats
Season | Rec | Rec Yds | Rec TDs |
---|---|---|---|
2018
JR
|
58 | 1,003 | 12 |
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.×