Kendallville reply to my Tweet

Seabreeze

1:21a, 4/20/24

There will definitely be no change at No. 1. https://t.co/1t1EgEPQll
— Kendall Rogers (@KendallRogers) April 20, 2024

TAMUallen

1:23a, 4/20/24

Let's not get ahead of ourselves. We have to keep playing at this level to stay at number one. I don't care even if the Pope says we're number one. We must keep performing

pirmag

3:23a, 4/20/24

The number one team shouldn't be giving up 13 runs in a DH.

Agthatbuilds

5:33a, 4/20/24

Just keep winning.

LB12Diamond

6:35a, 4/20/24

Rat Poison

cs69ag

7:01a, 4/20/24

We have been playing some "Gorilla Ball" lately.
It is the way LSU slugged themselves to several National Championships

BreNayPop

7:05a, 4/20/24

I love winning… but number 1 means nothing right now. I just want us to find that extra gear here in a month. As long as we remain top 8 then I'm good with whatever.

AggieBB

7:39a, 4/20/24

In reply to BreNayPop

BreNayPop said:
I love winning… but number 1 means nothing right now. I just want us to find that extra gear here in a month. As long as we remain top 8 then I'm good with whatever.

Yep all that matters. Earn a top 8 National seed.

Turf96

8:33a, 4/20/24

I don't care our seed or our path just make it to Omaha baby and wreck shop there. I want to see this team dance an Irish jig at the conclusion of the last game of the 2024 college baseball season. Oh there was a tree!!

McInnis

8:41a, 4/20/24

Does the committee still seed regional hosts 9-16? I think this has changed over the years, but what I'm getting at is does the no. 1 seeded national host draw an easier paring for its super regional than the no. 8 seed? I think it must, why else would the no. 1 through 8 seeds be ranked?

ensign_beedrill

8:52a, 4/20/24

In reply to Turf96

Turf96 said:
I don't care our seed or our path just make it to Omaha baby and wreck shop there. I want to see this team dance an Irish jig at the conclusion of the last game of the 2024 college baseball season. Oh there was a tree!!

How do we get the DJ at Charles Schwab to play Rattlin' Bog for us? Logistical question that needs to be sorted out now, ahead of time.

Agdad081216

8:55a, 4/20/24

I want to be Number 1 in June and we win the last game in June in Omaha.

Just an old dad who raise 3 Ags. Inherited 2 more. GIG’EM

ensign_beedrill

8:55a, 4/20/24

In reply to McInnis

McInnis said:
Does the committee still seed regional hosts 9-16? I think this has changed over the years, but what I'm getting at is does the no. 1 seeded national host draw an easier paring for its super regional than the no. 8 seed? I think it must, why else would the no. 1 through 8 seeds be ranked?

Yes, 1-16 are (allegedly) seeded in order. They started doing this a couple years ago. I still think they sometimes will mess with the order a little bit to get some more regional pairings, they just try not to do it blatantly. I think Alabama got stuck with a raw deal last year when they were seeded 16 and had to play at 1 Wake Forest. Alabama should have been a little higher than that.

Ag9701

8:57a, 4/20/24

Well according to ESPN, Arkansas is already #1

If you go to the NCAA baseball page on ESPN, it shows a video of #1 Arkansas rallying to beat number #20 South Carolina. TexAgs won't let me upload my screenshot.

Agdad081216

9:01a, 4/20/24

In reply to Ag9701

Here you go

Just an old dad who raise 3 Ags. Inherited 2 more. GIG’EM

aginlakeway

9:01a, 4/20/24

In reply to McInnis

McInnis said:
Does the committee still seed regional hosts 9-16? I think this has changed over the years, but what I'm getting at is does the no. 1 seeded national host draw an easier paring for its super regional than the no. 8 seed? I think it must, why else would the no. 1 through 8 seeds be ranked?

Yes. But those 16 seeds never all win their regionals.

Ag9701

9:04a, 4/20/24

In reply to Agdad081216

TY for the assist.

McInnis

9:05a, 4/20/24

I'm guessing it would be unusual for all 8 top seeds to win their regionals.

aginlakeway

9:10a, 4/20/24

In reply to McInnis

McInnis said:
I'm guessing it would be unusual for all 8 top seeds to win their regionals.

7 of the 16 seeds lost in regionals last year; 3 of the top 8 seeds lost.

Emilio Fantastico

9:11a, 4/20/24

In reply to ensign_beedrill

ensign_beedrill said:
McInnis said:
Does the committee still seed regional hosts 9-16? I think this has changed over the years, but what I'm getting at is does the no. 1 seeded national host draw an easier paring for its super regional than the no. 8 seed? I think it must, why else would the no. 1 through 8 seeds be ranked?
Yes, 1-16 are (allegedly) seeded in order. They started doing this a couple years ago. I still think they sometimes will mess with the order a little bit to get some more regional pairings, they just try not to do it blatantly. I think Alabama got stuck with a raw deal last year when they were seeded 16 and had to play at 1 Wake Forest. Alabama should have been a little higher than that.

Of course, the Texags conspiracy theorists believe the NCAA will do whatever they can in seeding to try to keep as many SEC teams out of the CWS.

LB12Diamond

9:12a, 4/20/24

In reply to aginlakeway

Last year was bizaroo world. No doubt

aginlakeway

9:15a, 4/20/24

In reply to LB12Diamond

LB12Diamond said:
Last year was bizaroo world. No doubt

Agree.

2 of top 8 lost in 2022.

1 of top 8 lost in 2021.

Baron de Bastrop

9:27a, 4/20/24

1 of top 8 lost in 2021.
2 of top 8 lost in 2022.
3 of top 8 lost in 2023.

So mathematically, 4 of the top 8 will lose this year!

TAMU1990

9:32a, 4/20/24

In reply to Agdad081216

Agdad081216 said:
Here you go

It looks like someone forgot to update the graphics. You get what you pay for.

Agdad081216

9:43a, 4/20/24

Maybe it was a wild hog eating a rooster?

Just an old dad who raise 3 Ags. Inherited 2 more. GIG’EM