Having NIKE is like hiring lefty Communists whose funds flow back to the univ. of oregon who then rob Texas Highschool Football Players from us. Nuck Fike.
11:43a, 5/5/24
Yes they should go with Nike.
Supporting the Oregan NIL program is every Aggies goal.
Supporting the Oregan NIL program is every Aggies goal.
2:42p, 5/5/24
In reply to Ringo88
I understand your point. I actually had one of those '70's jerseys as a fan. I'm not a historian on Aggie uniforms. However, in my opinion as an Aggie fan through the decades, there have been a handful of years where the Texas Aggies were not instantly recognizable on TV.
4:16p, 5/5/24
In reply to BCR
So dumb. You act like Nike is so broke that it needs all these Nike schools to support their NIL program for Oregon.
BCR said:
Yes they should go with Nike.
Supporting the Oregan NIL program is every Aggies goal.
So dumb. You act like Nike is so broke that it needs all these Nike schools to support their NIL program for Oregon.
6:41p, 5/5/24
In reply to greg.w.h
Isn't this because Henry has his own contract/relationship with Nike from before he was at A&M?
greg.w.h said:Pat Henry may disagree…his contract permits him an exception from the Adidas relationship. Presumably that matters to him.20ag07 said:Why would it be a recruiting advantage?Quote:
I wonder if being a nike school over adidas is a recruiting advantage, I guess nothing matters besides NIL nowadays anyway.
17yos deciding between schools aren't wearing more Nike than Adidas.
Isn't this because Henry has his own contract/relationship with Nike from before he was at A&M?