so it has mountain climbing cables? I can't wait to try this out.maroon barchetta said:AggiePhil said:
Bottom half is maroon today. Looking good!
The photo you posted isn't displaying properly.
Let me help you.
Does the bagel go on top?
so it has mountain climbing cables? I can't wait to try this out.maroon barchetta said:AggiePhil said:
Bottom half is maroon today. Looking good!
The photo you posted isn't displaying properly.
Let me help you.
Does the bagel go on top?
In John…Deere…green…kraut said:EliteElectric said:aggiepaintrain said:
Primer is on
maybe we will know the color this week
hope it's white
Wagner's jerseys from this weekend reminded me of this thread!
Aww, thanks!mhnatt said:
Nice update. Thanks for sharing. The kid comes out in me thinking how be cool to tour that and walk up those long inner stairs, then to peek out the top!
maroon barchetta said:
Does the paint match the official color?
https://brandguide.tamu.edu/visual-style/brand-colors
city would make a killing if they charged for repelling off that thing. kids would be lined up for miles.spike427 said:
Coming right along!
instapt said:
It looks real nice! I can't wait to see it finished!
etmydst said:
It's a no win situation...you and the stars don't like a little extra paint to make this water tower more aesthetically pleasing, yet a number of folks on here complained about how ugly the more cost efficient unpainted concrete looks on the new water tower.
Please elaborate for the uninformed masses.hopeandrealchange said:etmydst said:
It's a no win situation...you and the stars don't like a little extra paint to make this water tower more aesthetically pleasing, yet a number of folks on here complained about how ugly the more cost efficient unpainted concrete looks on the new water tower.
If it was just a little extra paint I would not have waisted my time here.
Problem is I understand the process required to paint those graphics on that project require a bit more than a little paint. And what really concerns me is that many have no idea of that.
It needs to at least be aesthetic. Everybody is going to be looking up at that graphic for years. This seems like a reasonable expense.hopeandrealchange said:etmydst said:
It's a no win situation...you and the stars don't like a little extra paint to make this water tower more aesthetically pleasing, yet a number of folks on here complained about how ugly the more cost efficient unpainted concrete looks on the new water tower.
If it was just a little extra paint I would not have waisted my time here.
Problem is I understand the process required to paint those graphics on that project require a bit more than a little paint. And what really concerns me is that many have no idea of that.
No. The water tower is a needed part for running a city. No one wants to stare at an ugly water tower every day. Painting it is a reasonable taxpayer expense.maroon barchetta said:
It's as reasonable as the Instagram prop.
hopeandrealchange said:
I have two questions.
How much more did it cost to add the graphics?
Who in the City approved the decision for the extra expense ?
Edit to add.
Every time I see this tower it reminds me of the lack of respect for our tax dollars.
techno-ag said:It needs to at least be aesthetic. Everybody is going to be looking up at that graphic for years. This seems like a reasonable expense.hopeandrealchange said:etmydst said:
It's a no win situation...you and the stars don't like a little extra paint to make this water tower more aesthetically pleasing, yet a number of folks on here complained about how ugly the more cost efficient unpainted concrete looks on the new water tower.
If it was just a little extra paint I would not have waisted my time here.
Problem is I understand the process required to paint those graphics on that project require a bit more than a little paint. And what really concerns me is that many have no idea of that.